ci: use ubuntu-24.04 again for release
#847
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #847 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 92.1% 92.1%
=====================================
Files 37 37
Lines 992 992
Branches 175 175
=====================================
Hits 914 914
Misses 62 62
Partials 16 16 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
mkniewallner
force-pushed
the
ci/put-back-ubuntu-24.04-release
branch
from
1ae2a6e to
7d20864
Compare
mkniewallner
force-pushed
the
ci/put-back-ubuntu-24.04-release
branch
from
7d20864 to
de75e22
Compare
|
Tested release workflow again following the switch to |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We had to go back to
ubuntu-22.04on #800 and #801. The issue was that we did not install a specific Python version, so we defaulted to the default one provided by the image, which ends up being externally managed.Smoke-testing the release workflow in https://github.com/fpgmaas/deptry/actions/runs/10753197835/job/29822356943 and it now works as expected.